|
From: | Malte Meyn |
Subject: | Re: sharping naturals |
Date: | Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:19:31 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 |
Am 24.07.2015 um 10:12 schrieb Peter Bjuhr:
Yes I meant g as in e minor, not fisis as in dis major. Maybe “produce a gis” would have been better than “lead to a gis”I think you misunderstood Malte's (not completely properly worded) question. He didn't use 'lead' in the sense of leading note. What he meant is: "If a key signature of b major (five sharps) is given and in a notation system typing 'g' would be interpreted as g sharp - what would you have to write if you want to express a g natural?"Yes, sorry for the misunderstanding! I wasn't grasping the full context of his question...
As the Germans say: “again what learnt” ;) Schon peinlich, ich hab vor vier Jahren ein ganz gutes Englisch-Leistungskurs-Abitur geschrieben und tu mich manchmal schwer mit klaren Formulierungen …
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |