lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Standard LilyPond score structure (Was: How do new users feel about


From: Urs Liska
Subject: Re: Standard LilyPond score structure (Was: How do new users feel about LilyPond's documentation?)
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:08:01 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0



Am 23.04.2015 um 04:59 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On 4/22/15 6:53 PM, "Kieren MacMillan" <address@hidden>
wrote:

Hi Gilles,

Yet you long for <some_tool> that would know how to remove a set of
bars from "That Production" project. :-P
A tool could do that *if* it knew what structure to expect.
I don¹t believe that¹s necessaryŠ but we can leave that aside for now,
since the technical investigation required to determine whether my
intuition is correct isn¹t worth it at this stage of the discussion.

By default, standardization is a Good Thing.
I agree 100%. (But, as an aside, many people wouldn¹t!)
Flexibility is also a Good Thing.  And standardization and flexibility are
always at odds with one another.

Similarly, brevity is a Good Thing.  And obviousness is a good thing.  And
brevity and obviousness are often at odds with one another.

The tradeoffs between these conflicting objectives are hard to make, and
opinions will differ on what the best solution is.

So we try to make the best decisions we can.

Well spoken.

I think having agreed-upon standards is good, but this shouldn't ever be enforced on the user.
Offering tools to generate standard layouts may be good.
Offering tools to validate (and possibly correct) against a (selectable) standard seems good too.

Urs

Thanks,

Carl


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]