Re: Displaying add9

[Jan Kohnert]

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014, 23:14:14 schrieb Big Noise:
> there's a snippet that can help:
> http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=459

[…]

> Does that help your issue?

that one helped to get the stuff out to the colleagues, so thanks! But still, 
looking at the sourcecode, it seems more like a workaround than a real 
solution. I consider it to be a bug.

Personally, I know of two major versions of displaying that stuff:
1.: <c e g d'> == Cadd9 and <c e g b d> == C9
2.: <c e g d'> == C9 and <c e g b d> == C7/9

Nothing I ever read, made <c e g d'> == <c e g h d>, simply because it's just 
wrong.

There was another chord, which I couldn't make print the right way: Cadd11. It 
whould be <c e g f'> but neither c1:11^7^9 (which I considered to be right 
Lilypond-Syntax), nor c11^7.9 (which was my second chance input) gave the 
correct result. And C11 (what was displayed in both trials) is just wrong, 
since it whould be <c e g b d f>, which is a totally different chord. 

Any of the devs there, who can clearify this one?

-- 
MfG Jan