lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: partcombine/divisi framework - let the fun begin!


From: Keith OHara
Subject: Re: partcombine/divisi framework - let the fun begin!
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 06:53:39 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)

Janek Warchoł <janek.lilypond <at> gmail.com> writes:

> I'm working on putting together a set of functions for handling parts
> that split into multiple voices and/or staves


> Attachment (definitions.ily): text/x-lilypond, 2359 bytes
> Attachment (example.ly): text/x-lilypond, 825 bytes
> Attachment (example.pdf): application/pdf, 33 KiB

I like the way 'definitions.ily' uses <<>> parallel music constructions
to ensure that the parts re-synchronize even if there is a note missing
in the input.  

You should do something similar for the \together segments.
As you have it now, the together segments are un-tagged, so are included
in all three staves (two of which are not printed).
But if someone uses these definitions with music that uses tags for 
some other purpose, the tagged music will be left out.









reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]