lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Any advice for getting emacs working with lilypond on MacOsX?


From: rif
Subject: Re: Any advice for getting emacs working with lilypond on MacOsX?
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 23:31:48 -0700

Actually, Tim, there *is* an incantation for Homebrew too, it just doesn't really work very easily.  It seems people are working on it.


On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Tim McNamara <address@hidden> wrote:
Oh, dear.  Very sorry for what seemed no doubt like an entire school of red herring.

There is an incantation to use for installing Frescobaldi via MacPorts (sudo port install lilypond) but not AFAIK Homebrew.

Much, much easier is David L’s .dmg Frescobaldi package that has already been identified with URL.  Had my answer been more complete (i.e., had I thought to include the flamin’ URL for the Frescobaldi package) things would have been much, much simpler for you.

IMHO Frescobaldi works better than Emacs and lilypond-mode, but some folks have Emacs keybindings coded into their fingers and prefer to stay with that.

In this case the incomplete answer was much worse than no answer at all.  I apologize, rif!





On May 10, 2014, at 8:01 AM, rif <address@hidden> wrote:

> FWIW, I spent multiple hours in install hell trying to get a homebrew install of frescobaldi to work, with zero success.  AFAICT homebrew doesn't really have forums or mailing lists?  I might stick with emacs for now.
>
> rif
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:32 PM, rif <address@hidden> wrote:
> And just to be clear, when you see Frescobaldi is easy to install, it looks to me like I have to first install Homebrew, then I have to manually install XQuartz and and MacTeX [neither of which is packaged with Homebrew], and *then* I can just do a "brew install frescobaldi"?
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:15 PM, rif <address@hidden> wrote:
> Cool.  Maybe it makes sense to update the documentation to indicate the elisp files are in the precompiled tarball and just to point at them?  That "make install" is a red herring.
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:15 PM, R. Mattes <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2014 13:44:31 -0500, Tim McNamara wrote
> > [...snip...]
> > (setq path
> >
> "/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/Users/tim/bin:/Users/YOUR_USER_NAME/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin")
> > (setenv "PATH" path)
> >
> > (setq load-path (append (list
> (expand-file-name"/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/share/emacs/site-lisp"))
> load-path))
>
> Much easier to do:
> (add-to-list 'load-path
> (expand-file-name"/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/share/emacs/site-lisp"))
>
>
> Cheers, Ralf Mattes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]