lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Feature Request] \compressFullBarRests improvement(s)


From: Alex Loomis
Subject: Re: [Feature Request] \compressFullBarRests improvement(s)
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 09:28:17 -0500

How would it behave if \draftSkip were, instead of being changed, tagged, and 
you ran lilypond with exclude-tag #draft? (I can't remember the syntax off the 
top of my head, but I think that's reasonably close.)



On Dec 27, 2013, at 1:38 AM, "Keith OHara" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:44:56 -0800, Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> I look forward to stress-testing this in the very near future.
> 
> One missing feature is that \mergeSkips doesn't look inside {...} to see if 
> they are empty.  I often set breaks for proofreading and then remove them by 
> defining them as an empty {}
>  draftBreak = {} %% \pageBreak
>  conductor = { s1*5 \draftBreak s1*3 }
> 
> I could make \mergeSkips {s1*5 {} s1*3} check if the {..} is completely empty 
> and output s1*8, but if it gets too complicated for my sake its behavior will 
> confuse and maybe frustrate somebody else.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]