[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11 |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:15:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
Am 16.10.2013 17:42, schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 16.10.2013 17:39, schrieb Phil Burfitt:
Hi Janek,
In my current work flow, I have a .ly file of functions in a non
lilypond
directory, which I \include in all of my scores. Is there a way to
define a
path for include files in Frescobaldi, or do I have to give the
full path in
the \include statement?
I included the path in the "Lilypond include path" in the Preferences
dialog, but Frescobaldi does not find it.
This should do what you want, so if it doesn't work, please file a
bug report.
Will do.
Note that you should specify the path to the directory containing that
file, not to the file itself.
Yes I did...in fact the dialog will only allow you to choose a
directory and not a filename.
Does it make any difference if you use Publication, Custom or Preview
Mode?
Urs
Hm, looking at the code (Preview Mode additions) I had a certain idea:
When compiling in preview mode, the include path isn't extended by the
path to the preview mode files, but instead there is another '-I' option
appended to the command line.
So in Preview Mode Frescobaldi will now use (excerpt)
lilypond ... -I PATHS-FROM-PREFERENCES ... -I PATH-TO-DEBUG-MODE-FILES
However, when I tested right now everything works as expected.
So a question to the others:
Is it possible that the second -I command line option shadows the first
on Windows while it doesn't on Linux?
Phil: Could you test this with plain command line LilyPond please?
Urs
- RE: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Peter Gentry, 2013/10/16
- Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Peter Gentry, 2013/10/16
- Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Phil Burfitt, 2013/10/16
- Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Janek WarchoĊ, 2013/10/16
- Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Phil Burfitt, 2013/10/16
- Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Urs Liska, 2013/10/16
- Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11,
Urs Liska <=
- Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Phil Burfitt, 2013/10/16
- Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Phil Burfitt, 2013/10/16
- Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, David Kastrup, 2013/10/16
- Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Phil Burfitt, 2013/10/16
- Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Urs Liska, 2013/10/16
- Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, David Kastrup, 2013/10/16
- Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Phil Burfitt, 2013/10/16
- Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, address@hidden, 2013/10/16
- Message not available
- Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, address@hidden, 2013/10/16
Re: Frescobaldi 2.0.11, Phil Burfitt, 2013/10/17