RE: Ossia - Documentation Recommendation

[Mark Stephen Mrotek]

Eluze,

Thank you for your interest in this matter.
An "ossia" is an alternative passage which may be played instead of the
original passage. As such it should (must?) have the same key signature.
Attached are two files. One does not have the key signature in the ossia
(without.ly) and the other has the key signature (with.ly).
Be assured that I made this suggestion after encounter and resolving an
issue in my encoding.

Mark Stephen Mrotek

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Eluze
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 3:46 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Ossia - Documentation Recommendation

Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote
> When the instructions for Ossia
> (http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/modifying-si
> ngle-s
> taves#ossia-staves) are followed, a key signature is not included. 
> This may be because all of the examples are in c major.

or because it's a new staff and not all the staves use the same key or clef?

> Perhaps the documentation could include a notation (see red below).

please feel free to suggest some text to add to the documentation!

Eluze



--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Ossia-Documentation-Recommendation-tp1
52082p152095.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

with.ly
Description: Text Data

without.ly
Description: Text Data