[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SMuFL
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: SMuFL |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Aug 2013 07:50:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>> I think "so poorly documented that in practice almost no one can
>> understand how it works" still can't qualify as "in effect
>> proprietary".
>
> It is not *that* badly documented. However, the number of people who
> understand Metafont are rather small today.
git shortlog -sn mf/
459 Han-Wen Nienhuys
160 Jan Nieuwenhuizen
104 Werner Lemberg
20 Jürgen Reuter
16 Carl D. Sorensen
15 Janek Warchoł
11 Mats Bengtsson
7 Bertrand Bordage
7 Maximilian Albert
4 David Kastrup
4 Graham Percival
4 John Mandereau
4 Phil Holmes
4 Tom Cato Amundsen
3 Erlend Aasland
3 Marc Hohl
3 Patrick McCarty
3 Reinhold Kainhofer
3 Rune Zedeler
2 Aleksandr Andreev
2 Neil Puttock
1 Benkő Pál
1 Carsten Steger
1 Glen Prideaux
1 Julien Rioux
1 Mark Polesky
1 Michael Welsh Duggan
1 Nicolas Sceaux
Some of those will have worked on the build system rather than the fonts
themselves, but I doubt that all of those working on the fonts had
previous exposure to Metafont/Metapost.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Re: SMuFL, (continued)
- Re: SMuFL, Andrew Bernard, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, David Kastrup, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Andrew Bernard, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Urs Liska, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Andrew Bernard, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Urs Liska, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, David Rogers, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/08/11
- Re: SMuFL,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: SMuFL, Janek Warchoł, 2013/08/17
- Re: SMuFL, David Kastrup, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Andrew Bernard, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, David Kastrup, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Carl Peterson, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Urs Liska, 2013/08/10
- Re: SMuFL, Johan Vromans, 2013/08/11
- Re: SMuFL, Urs Liska, 2013/08/11
- Re: SMuFL, David Kastrup, 2013/08/11
- Re: SMuFL, Andrew Bernard, 2013/08/11