|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Discuss signature for new function \annotate |
Date: | Thu, 06 Jun 2013 12:09:05 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
Hi, I want to develop a 'lilypond-doc' package that can be used to a) document the API of a project or a library and b) document the musical content of lilypond scores. You can see an overview of its goals on https://github.com/openlilylib/lilypond-doc/wiki I urgently need at least the function signature of the core function of b) in order to be able to use it in an existing score, even when I haven't implemented the functionality yet. As I think this can become a valuable extension and I'd like to see it in LilyPond proper one day I'd like to discuss it on this list before actually starting to work. On https://github.com/openlilylib/lilypond-doc/wiki/Documenting-musical-content you'll find a quite detailed description what I think the function should look like, attached you'll find an example file showing how I'd use it in a score. I'm interested in - general thoughts on the signature design (as I still lack experience with Scheme functions) - more or different use cases, especially if they'd suggest changes in the signature design Best Urs |
test-file.ly
Description: Text Data
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |