[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score.
From: |
Sarah k Alawami |
Subject: |
Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score. |
Date: |
Thu, 23 May 2013 10:46:10 -0700 |
I was thinking of putting my variables in each file that way I can do a bit
less less typing, at least in that file. will this still work in the end when
I compile all files in to one score and parts for the choir and me and the
pianist? Well, I won't need the score, how ever the person conducting it
might. *smiles*
Take care all.
On May 21, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Ian Hulin <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi wjm and list,
> On 17/05/13 02:26, wjm wrote:
>> Greetings!
>> After watching Sarah K Alawami's work on a score recently on this
>> user-list, but not having the musical and compositional skills to make
>> constructive remarks, and after reading the thread entitled 'stylesheet
>> structure', it occurred to me that an approach might be found which
>> might make the whole process a little less opaque.
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>>
> Here is a pointer to some of the templates referenced in the Learning
> Manual as Appendix A5:
>
> (development version documentation)
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/learning/orchestral-templates
>
> (stable version documentation)
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/learning/orchestral-templates
>
> If you want to invest a bit more time, there are a couple of packages
> which allow you to set up large score if you invest a bit of time in the
> learning curve, both of which I have used.
>
> One is Reinhold Kainhofer's orchestrallily, which is at
> http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/orchestrallily/index.html#The-Orchestrallily-Package
>
> There is a pointer to download the file at that address. Once
> downloaded, you may need to run it through convert-ly if running a
> version of LilyPond after V2.14. Reinhold has had to bow out of
> actively participating in the LilyPond lists, but I'm sure he'd be OK
> answering any queries from people using the package.
>
> The other possibility is Mark Witmer's ly-score package at github - see
> www.github/mwitmer/LyUtil#readme.
>
> Hope this is useful.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian Hulin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- An idea for a systematic development of a large score., wjm, 2013/05/16
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., Sarah k Alawami, 2013/05/16
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2013/05/17
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., Shevek, 2013/05/17
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., Wim van Dommelen, 2013/05/17
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., Ian Hulin, 2013/05/21
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score.,
Sarah k Alawami <=
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., Wim van Dommelen, 2013/05/23
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., David Kastrup, 2013/05/23
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., Wim van Dommelen, 2013/05/24
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., Christ van Willegen, 2013/05/26
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., David Kastrup, 2013/05/26
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., Urs Liska, 2013/05/26
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., luis jure, 2013/05/26
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., Urs Liska, 2013/05/26
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., Sarah k Alawami, 2013/05/23
- Re: An idea for a systematic development of a large score., Wim van Dommelen, 2013/05/24