[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break
From: |
Shane Brandes |
Subject: |
Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:06:44 -0400 |
I never make mistakes playing until someone throws in a cautionary
accidental. Somehow they often become something other than the note it
already is on account of that extra visual distraction. There is for
me a need to change the note even though it would have been correct
without such additional cautions. Unless the passage is extremely
ambiguous i strongly prefer to have them left out. i.e. use such
practices as are from the classical era. In a tied situation as that
it is a sin. One should never read backwards your mind and fingers
have already passed through that and must know where they are destined
to go next. If you cannot remember what a chord is from one staff to
the next you are simply not concentrating.
Shane
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Kieren MacMillan
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I don't see the ambiguity.
>
> So, upon seeing the screenshot I sent, you immediately knew that it was a
> C-natural, even though there's a C-sharp in the key signature and no other
> [contradicting] accidental?
> You should be the star of a clairvoyance show in Vegas! ;)
>
>> The note is tied anyway and not to be articulated
>> if I were to start playing from that measure. If I want to play the note I
>> have to look back anyway.
>
> Yes, but if there's no line break, you only have to look back a few cm — If
> there's a line break, you have to look to the right a much longer distance,
> then move up a system, register the correct accidental, then do the long
> return trip to the original note. The "repeated" accidental saves this long
> processing time.
>
>> I don't think this has something to do with classical or non-classical
>> music or a piece having or not having a key signature.
>
> Agreed.
>
> Best regards,
> Kieren.
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, (continued)
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Robert Schmaus, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Robert Schmaus, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Karol Majewski, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Noeck, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Noeck, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, TaoCG, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break,
Shane Brandes <=
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, David Kastrup, 2013/03/27
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Trevor Daniels, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Phil Holmes, 2013/03/26
Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Richard Shann, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Janek Warchoł, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, TaoCG, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, Richard Shann, 2013/03/26
- Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break, TaoCG, 2013/03/26