|
From: | Robert Schmaus |
Subject: | Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break |
Date: | Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:56:04 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
I play and typeset a lot of latin american music which has a lot of syncopation which makes this particlar scene appear quite often. Maybe I got used to something non-standard but it still seems more logical to me to omit the tied accidental and treat the measure as if there was no line break.
I can confirm that also from pov of jazz music - I've looked through some of the "official" jazz publications and haven't seen any accidentals on tied-and-broken notes. Perhaps Gould's rule in this case is mainly meant for classical notation practice?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |