[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: F-flat Key Signature
From: |
David Rogers |
Subject: |
Re: F-flat Key Signature |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:37:50 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
> But F flat _is_ different from E, especially in its relationship to
> other, 'normal' keys. F flat has a quite simple relation to G flat
> that might happen in real music. So I'm happy that LilyPond offers to
> explicitely write it down instead of refusing to do things, _she_
> considers useless. Even if I'd probably never use it ...
I don't think Lilypond should have its behaviour changed at all over
this issue. I think the composer simply needs to change his mind about
printing in F-flat major. I know he has composed in F-flat major, and I
do NOT think he needs to change the composition itself - but I think
compromising the printed copy by showing it in E major is the (not
strictly correct but far more practical) way to ask the musicians to
play the composition.
--
David
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, (continued)
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Mark Knoop, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Urs Liska, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Vaughan McAlley, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, David Nalesnik, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Urs Liska, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Mark Knoop, 2012/09/19
Re: F-flat Key Signature, David Rogers, 2012/09/19