[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: Re: F-flat Key Signature
From: |
michael.strebl |
Subject: |
AW: Re: F-flat Key Signature |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:26:01 +0200 |
Hi,
I have to agree with david. I studied music and piano and i never saw a piece
composed with key-signature f-flat. It would be completly unreadable. Any
musician would reject to study a piece with a double-flat in the
key-signature.
It's amazing that lilypond supports such strange things but from the
practical point of view its useless.
Just write e-major and the musicans will be thankfull ;-).
Kind regards
Michael
----- Originalnachricht -----
Von: David Rogers [mailto:address@hidden
Gesendet: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 06:18 PM
An: Lilypond-user <address@hidden>
Betreff: Re: F-flat Key Signature
keith Luke <address@hidden> writes:
> Does anyone know why the flats appear our of order when the key
> signature is F-flat?
I'm really only summarizing what's been said: that it's probably already
correct, that it's probably a bad idea to use it, and that the score is
truly unreadable with the size mismatch between the staff and the things
that are on it. I'd vote for E major in this section.
--
David R
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, (continued)
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Martin Tarenskeen, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Thomas Morley, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Mark Knoop, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Urs Liska, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Vaughan McAlley, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, David Nalesnik, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Urs Liska, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Mark Knoop, 2012/09/19
Re: F-flat Key Signature, David Rogers, 2012/09/19
- AW: Re: F-flat Key Signature,
michael.strebl <=