[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:15:16 +0100 |
Hi Phil,
2012/2/28 Thomas Morley <address@hidden>:
> Hi Phil,
>
> in the LSR-tarball I found the directory "correction-wanted", shall I
> fix these files too? (I'd think, some of them should be deleted)
>
> I didn't look in the other directories. It seems they contain only
> sorted duplicates. Or am I wrong?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Harm
I just downloaded the latest tarball from the LSR and tested our work:
No "failed" file.
No "ERROR"
One "error": reported here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2012-02/msg01036.html
8 files gave a "warning" (but they did it in 2.12.3 too, or the
warning is related to known bug, so I'd suggest to end the work on
these files)
Seems I can see the light at the end of the tunnel. :)
Possible list of further work:
TODO
Convert:
Converting some files gave:
"Not smart enough to convert minimum-Y-extent.
Vertical spacing no longer depends on the Y-extent of a VerticalAxisGroup.
Please refer to the manual for details, and update manually."
(or sth similiar).
Could be fixed.
Files:
Including-a-file-only-once.ly
David Kastrup wrote:
>> #(define-public toplevel-module-define-public! #f)
>> #(define-public toplevel-module-ref #f)
>Those can be replaced by their straightforward counterpart.
But I couldn't find them.
use-custom-fonts-flat-b-and-sharp-#-symbols-for-chords.ly
David Kastrup wrote:
> What are people's feelings about the rather bland compatibility fix of
> just catching a wrong-number-of-args error and try calling without that
> arg? Possibly lowercasing the result manually afterwards (if the flag
> is set), but that may not work with arbitrary markups.
>
> If we don't want to encourage a mixture of code styles flying around, we
> can still emit a warning.
>
> Of course, this snippet itself should be changed, but we could help with
> compatibility in that manner.
I'm not sure how to proceed.
woodwind-diagrams-key-lists.ly
Failed!
Don't know what to do with it!
Deleted for now!
The only thing I could imagine to carry on, is to fix the files where
convert-ly gave "Not smart enough ...", but I'd suggest to postpone
it.
If you agree, what to do now?
Best,
Harm
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/27
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/27
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/27
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/29
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/29
- Message not available
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/26
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/27
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/25
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/25
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/25
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/23
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/24
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/25