[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:11:07 +0100 |
Hi David N, David K,
2012/2/21 David Nalesnik <address@hidden>:
> David,
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:10 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sorry for the unnecessary work caused by not thinking about this
>> sufficiently from your point of view. And sorry for the "it does not
>> take a genius" tone of my previous message that was uncalled for, stupid
>> and offensive.
>
>
> Quite alright--I learned something valuable and I have a lot still to learn!
> (One of which is learning how to work with multiple versions resident on my
> computer, one of them being the very latest.)
>
> -David
just back, I've read your discussion about converting.
And I've to confess using the 2.14.2-convert-ly, too.
To avoid such misunderstanding in the future I'll make a request about
a doc addition to the CG on bug-lilypond.
Thanks,
Harm
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Carl Sorensen, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/20