[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bounties
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Bounties |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:10:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Tim McNamara <address@hidden> writes:
> It is quite possible that the Lilypond team doesn't want to have to
> set up accounting and disbursement mechanisms, however. There are
> some headaches and legalities that would be involved which might be
> more trouble than they are worth.
That is the current problem. I doubt that there is enough potential to
be tapped that setting up the respective independent channels and
administration would not consume more resources than they would deliver.
Of course, I am always ready to be pleasantly surprised.
> I've done a lot of work for free over the course of my life so far
> because it was so much less hassle than dealing with getting paid for
> it.
Same here. In this particular case however, I need to end up getting
paid for it eventually because I am currently focusing fulltime on it.
And it is requiring enough focus and concentration that if I were to do
something else for supporting myself, I would have to cut out even
looking at LilyPond completely to have the resources for that. I am too
much of a single-minded person.
--
David Kastrup
- Bounties (was: User vs Developer), Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/01/24
- Re: Bounties, David Kastrup, 2012/01/24
- Re: Bounties, Tim McNamara, 2012/01/24
- Re: Bounties, Marc Hohl, 2012/01/25
- Re: Bounties, Shevek, 2012/01/25
- Re: Bounties, David Kastrup, 2012/01/25
- Re: Bounties, Marc Hohl, 2012/01/25
- Re: Bounties, David Kastrup, 2012/01/25
- Re: Bounties, Tim McNamara, 2012/01/25
- Re: Bounties,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Bounties, David Kastrup, 2012/01/25