Re: parallelMusic and repeat

[Alexander Kobel]

David Kastrup wrote:
> -Eluze <address@hidden> writes:
> > i think \parallelMusic is just thought for a quick and easy input -
> > without sophisticated structuring of a piece!
>
> In my personal opinion, tools of "quick and easy" nature that do not fit
> well with the rest of Lilypond, partly because a "proper" implementation
> would require quite more invasive changes, don't belong in the core
> language but in the LSR.

To be honest: +1.
Although it's an example of a functionality that IMHO is to valuable to 
be hidden inside the LSR without mentioning it in the NR, and having it 
in the core at least gives a /little bit/ of standardization. But it's 
definitely not prime time yet, and from a just more idealistic point of 
view, you're absolutely right.