[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals
From: |
Mark Knoop |
Subject: |
Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:08:35 +0100 |
At 13:39 on 31 Aug 2009, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> How is insisting on one mode of pitch entry any different from
> insisting on every note having its duration number? Or insisting on
> specifying an octave with each note, ruling out relative pitch? How
> is \followKeySignature any different in philosophy or specificity or
> la-la-la from \relative pitch? The difference is that
> \followKeySignature would *seem* to be more difficult to implement,
> when, provided that the key signature to be followed is specified
> independently, it would be very simple. The initial impulse for the
> negative attitude, which has prevented any thought of how the thing
> could and should be done, is simple laziness.
You seem to misunderstand how open source software development works.
It is not laziness for someone to not spend time on a feature that they
have no need for.
> I have an editing tool that works, and I can continue to use it and
> make it available to any who are interested.
Please post this magic script so we can see how your solution is
implemented.
> I just get tired
> of reading the nonsense and insults whenever anyone questions this
> irrational decision not to make following the key signature an option
> in lilypond. The decision does the coders no credit. Regards, daveA
I have just read through most of this thread again, and the only
insults I find come from you.
--
Mark Knoop
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, (continued)
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, David Raleigh Arnold, 2009/08/29
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Patrick McCarty, 2009/08/29
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/08/29
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Graham Percival, 2009/08/30
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, David Bobroff, 2009/08/30
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/08/30
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, David Raleigh Arnold, 2009/08/30
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/08/30
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, David Raleigh Arnold, 2009/08/31
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/08/31
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals,
Mark Knoop <=
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, David Raleigh Arnold, 2009/08/29
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/08/29
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/08/29
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, David Raleigh Arnold, 2009/08/31
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, David Rogers, 2009/08/31
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/08/31
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Kees van den Doel, 2009/08/31
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/08/31
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Francisco Vila, 2009/08/31
- Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/08/31