Re: ugly .ps output

[Mats Bengtsson]

If you clarify what you mean by "ugly", it's easier to comment on your 
problems.
Do you mean fussy-looking or do you mean that certain symbols are 
missing or replaced
by something else? Also, what kind of applications do you use when 
viewing/printing the PS file.

The Postscript output by LilyPond is primarily intended as an 
intermediate format which then
is converted to PDF format (LilyPond does this internally, by calling 
Ghostscript). Certain
constructs in the Postscript output are a bit special and won't work 
with all Postscript
interpreters and printers.

   /Mats

François Labadens wrote:
> I tried to use the .ps output, but it's not so good as the .pdf one. It's the
> same thing under Windows XP or Ubuntu 7.10.
> Do you have any solutions ?
>
> François
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>   

--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        School of Electrical Engineering
        Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
       Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================