Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden escreveu:

> Since the duration would be the second of three arguments, it could not be
> optional, but that's not a problem.
> 
> I think (?) this would have the side effect that \tuplet 3:2 2. would
> be the same as \tuplet 6:4 2. or \tuplet 9:6 2., which would mean
> that it would always be OK (even if not required) to express the ratio
> in reduced form (3:2 here).

1. We want to cut back on optional constructs

2. \tuplet 6:4 2. { .. }  is a lot of numbers. Not very readable IMO.

-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

LilyPond Software Design
 -- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com