[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Single Straight Eighths?
From: |
Dave LaDelfa |
Subject: |
Re: Single Straight Eighths? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:16:00 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
S L Raymond <sly_raymond <at> charter.net> writes:
>
> In a Jazz chart with mostly swung eighth notes, what is the preferred
> nomenclature for a single straight 8th note?
A single one? I can't imagine how you've not have some multiple of 2.
Completely unambiguous would be the designation "no swing" above the notes in
question and "swing" immediately after.
Or even better: use the same horizontal dashed line and closing foot as is used
for 8va signs, e.g.
No swing-----------------| Swing
(notes) (notes) (more notes) (notes)
The "duol" suggestion someone else gave is also pretty good. (I believe the
actual term is "duplet") In this case, two eigth notes with a bracket and the
numeral 2 over them doesn't mean exactly the same thing it does in 6/8 music
(e.g. to change the length of the eighths by 150%), but it's a visual indicator
that you want them played somehow differently -- more "squarely" -- from their
neighbors.
I'd use the duplet-bracket indication WITH a text label "(not swung)" the first
time it appears, and then the duplet-bracket by itself thereafter. That should
be fairly clear to most players.
> IMO, the markup "straight" is a bit crowded for just one or two notes.
> I've considered using a sixteenth-dotted eighth figure, supposing that a
> performer would interpret the "ahead of the beat" implication.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Lyle
>