Am Freitag, den 16.10.2020, 15:46 +0200 schrieb Michael Käppler:
Am 15.10.2020 um 23:03 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
we're using both `@url` and `@uref` commands in our documentation,
the overwhelming majority is `@uref`.
michael] ~/lilypond/Documentation/en (master)]> git grep '@url' | wc
-l
9
michael] ~/lilypond/Documentation/en (master)]> git grep '@uref' | wc
-l
622
The functionality is exactly the same:
https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/_0040url.html
I'd like to unify this. Shall we go with `@uref` to avoid big diffs
and because it is already the majority, or use `@url` what seems
more intuitive to me?
Since this is a pure mechanical change that can be done by a little
script I favour a change to `@url` everywhere.
Here you are:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/462
As commented there, this is the absolutely worst moment to post such
mechanical change with no merit (as far as I understand): This will be
a real nightmare of merge conflicts when picking commits between master
and the to-be-created stable/2.22.