Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3279 in lilypond: space consecutive tempo marks

[lilypond]

Updates:
        Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-waiting

Comment #26 on issue 3279 by address@hidden: space consecutive tempo  
marks
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3279

> Placement should be correct for RehearsalMark alone (i.e. where a
> barline *would be*) and if there is a possible collision, it should be
> handled by "collision avoidance", like for any other grob!

Collision avoidance for objects that align above fixed objects (that use  
the break-align interface) is purely vertical.  The placement rules pick  
the first object from the givne list that is present, which is generally  
useful, so placing the rehearsal mark objects where something else /would  
be/ is tricky.

> IIRC there was an agreement that tempo indications should be
> 1. left-aligned on left-hand side of TimeSignature
> 2. left-aligned on (left-hand side of) the first note
> 3. (if MMR), left-aligned on (left-hand side of) **where the first note  
> would be**.

Possibly.  That is the set of rules I originally proposed; see image in  
comment #1

If a partial solution based on is not acceptable, this will wait until  
version 2.20.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings