libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Libtool 2.1b test results


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: Libtool 2.1b test results
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 09:22:19 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

* Mike Frysinger wrote on Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 08:37:31AM CET:
> On Saturday 09 February 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Mike Frysinger wrote on Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 05:38:19AM CET:
> > > all of the tests pass with libtool-1.5.26 ...
> >
> > Do all of the old-style tests of 2.1b pass for you, too?  The Autotest
> > ones are all new.
> 
> the ones that just say PASS/SKIP/FAIL like in libtool-1.x ?  yes, those all 
> passed.

Yes, I meant those.  Thanks.

> # Whether or not to optimize for fast installation.
> fast_install=needless

This looks very weird to me, and I cannot explain it at all.  Did you use
any patches on top of 2.1b?  You didn't `./configure --disable-shared'
either.  And shlibpath_overrides_runpath is no, too.

> # Shared library runtime path variable.
> runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH
> 
> # Shared library path variable.
> shlibpath_var=LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> 
> # Is shlibpath searched before the hard-coded library search path?
> shlibpath_overrides_runpath=no

Cheers,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]