[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Libtool 2.1b test results
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Libtool 2.1b test results |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Feb 2008 07:30:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Hi Mike,
* Mike Frysinger wrote on Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 05:38:19AM CET:
>
> are the tests supposed to pass ? because they dont for me :)
Yes, they are.
> all of the tests pass with libtool-1.5.26 ...
Do all of the old-style tests of 2.1b pass for you, too? The Autotest
ones are all new.
> here's the summary:
> testsuite: 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 21 23 26 28 29 54 55 56 63 64 failed
>
> random info about build system:
> binutils-2.18.50.0.4
> gcc-4.2.2
> glibc-2.7
> linux-2.6.24
>
> testsuite.log is attached
What's output of `./libtool --config'?
Thanks,
Ralf
- Re: GNU Libtool 2.1b released (alpha release), (continued)
- Re: GNU Libtool 2.1b released (alpha release), Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/02/05
- Re: GNU Libtool 2.1b released (alpha release), Jason Curl, 2008/02/06
- Re: GNU Libtool 2.1b released (alpha release), Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/02/06
- Re: GNU Libtool 2.1b released (alpha release), Simon Josefsson, 2008/02/06
- Re: GNU Libtool 2.1b released (alpha release), Pavel Roskin, 2008/02/07
- Libtool 2.1b test results, Mike Frysinger, 2008/02/08
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Mike Frysinger, 2008/02/09
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/09
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/12
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Mike Frysinger, 2008/02/12
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/13
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/02/13
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/13
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/19
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/02/20
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Mike Frysinger, 2008/02/13