[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:19:45 -0600 (CST) |
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
I would approve a patch which added LT_TRY_LINK or some such macro, and
created a temporary configure time libtool script to do so. I think it would
be a fairly hefty patch though. There is certainly enough information
available to allow this as soon as the LT_INIT macro is complete, though
there will be issues with quoting, as things are quoted one extra time
because of the intervening config.status.
In my configure.ac file, which I have been updating for libtool-2.0,
LT_LANG(C++) occurs after LT_INIT() so it seems that the above
statement may be bogus.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
- Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests, Sander Niemeijer, 2004/11/18
- Re: Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/19
- Re: Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/19
- Re: Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/22
- Re: Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests, Kevin P. Fleming, 2004/11/22
- Re: Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/22
- Re: Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests, Kevin P. Fleming, 2004/11/22
- Re: Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests, Sander Niemeijer, 2004/11/22
- Re: Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/22
- Re: Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests, Sander Niemeijer, 2004/11/22
- Re: Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/22
- Re: Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests, Sander Niemeijer, 2004/11/22