Re: Using libtool 2.0 in autoconf tests

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Hi Sander,

Sander Niemeijer wrote:
> If more people require this functionality then I am all for including it
> in the libtool package. However, this doesn't answer the question
> whether the macro should be based on a libtool script or not.
> Furthermore, other users might have other macros that are also perfectly
> valid in wanting to use the libtool script. How do we deal with those
> macros?

Oversimplifying, but: In a configure script, you can spell
`libtool -[options] [objects]' as `LT_CHECK_LIB([options], [objects])'.
Maybe we need LT_LINK_IFELSE instead/as well.

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature