[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler
From: |
mcnichol |
Subject: |
Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:03:36 -0500 |
> From address@hidden Thu Jul 19 22:49:20 2001
> Our signals were crossed. In the first paragraph I was indeed wondering
> about the later -Wl,-blibpath,$libdir:/usr/lib:/lib completely overriding
> the earlier -nolibpath, but I was hypothesizing that there must be (or must
> have been) some need for it.
I finished checking this on AIX 4.3.3. The -blibpath and -bnolibpath
do override each other (the last one wins). So it looks like the
-bnolibpath flag has never done anything useful, as it has always come
before -blibpath. It could be safely removed if it hasn't already.
> After the sentence that starts with "In addition", I'm wondering about
> the *other* "override" -- there are two instances of an _LT_AC_TAGVAR for
> hardcode_libdir_flag_spec. My guess is the first one of those is getting
> overriden. That's what I was asking about in the last question.
Is this really a problem? I think part of what may have been clipped is
if then else. However (on AIX Power) it looks like they can be the same
for regular AIX linking and run-time-linking so it can be set once
outside of the "if" statement.
Dan
> >> From address@hidden Wed Jul 18 17:30:53 2001
> >> From: Tim Mooney <address@hidden>
> >>
> >> I was looking at that too, and wondering why it made it into libtool.
> >> It must have solved some problem for someone, but it makes me wonder.
> >> In addition, in that section in libtool-1.4b's libtool.m4, I see:
> >>
> >> _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec, $1)='${wl}-bnolibpath
> >> ${wl}-blibpath:$libdir:/usr/lib:/lib'
> >>
> >> [bunch of stuff deleted]
> >>
> >> _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec,
> >> $1)='${wl}-blibpath:$libdir:/usr/lib:/lib'
> >>
> >>
> >> Does that mean what I think it does -- the first one is getting overridden
> >> by the second one?
>
- Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler, (continued)
- Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler, Erik Lindahl, 2001/07/19
- Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler, mcnichol, 2001/07/19
- Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler,
mcnichol <=
- Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler, Erik Lindahl, 2001/07/21
- Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler, mcnichol, 2001/07/23