[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler
From: |
Tim Mooney |
Subject: |
Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 22:49:17 -0500 (CDT) |
In regard to: Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler, address@hidden said...:
>I'm not positive, but that is how most of the other flags work.
>The man page isn't too clear in this case though.
>
>I guess the only way to find out is to test it.
Our signals were crossed. In the first paragraph I was indeed wondering
about the later -Wl,-blibpath,$libdir:/usr/lib:/lib completely overriding
the earlier -nolibpath, but I was hypothesizing that there must be (or must
have been) some need for it.
After the sentence that starts with "In addition", I'm wondering about
the *other* "override" -- there are two instances of an _LT_AC_TAGVAR for
hardcode_libdir_flag_spec. My guess is the first one of those is getting
overriden. That's what I was asking about in the last question.
>> From address@hidden Wed Jul 18 17:30:53 2001
>> From: Tim Mooney <address@hidden>
>>
>> I was looking at that too, and wondering why it made it into libtool.
>> It must have solved some problem for someone, but it makes me wonder.
>> In addition, in that section in libtool-1.4b's libtool.m4, I see:
>>
>> _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec, $1)='${wl}-bnolibpath
>> ${wl}-blibpath:$libdir:/usr/lib:/lib'
>>
>> [bunch of stuff deleted]
>>
>> _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec,
>> $1)='${wl}-blibpath:$libdir:/usr/lib:/lib'
>>
>>
>> Does that mean what I think it does -- the first one is getting overridden
>> by the second one?
Tim
--
Tim Mooney address@hidden
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
- Problems with AIX4 Compiler, Bill Wendling, 2001/07/18
- Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler, Erik Lindahl, 2001/07/19
- Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler, mcnichol, 2001/07/19
- Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler,
Tim Mooney <=
- Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler, mcnichol, 2001/07/20
- Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler, Erik Lindahl, 2001/07/21
- Re: Problems with AIX4 Compiler, mcnichol, 2001/07/23