[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupda
From: |
Michael Matz |
Subject: |
Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates] |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:56:58 +0200 (MET DST) |
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, edward wrote:
> how about a sub-optimal (but at least an) improvement?
>
> something along the lines of
... loop to remove consecutive duplicates.
>
> This cuts down on all the extraneous stuff *safely*, i think.
Yep, This is the best duplicate removal for archives which can be done
safely. Unfortunately it doesn't really work to _really_ reduce command
line length by much. E.g. in former times on KDE we had lines like this:
"-la -la -lb -la -lb -la -lb" ad infinitum (nearly ;) ) The loop above
would only remove the second -la, although all libs were shared. I'm not
against this thing, just wanted to say, that it's application would not be
the full solution.
Ciao,
Michael.
- RE: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cyg winupdates], Boehne, Robert, 2001/04/04
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], edward, 2001/04/05
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates],
Michael Matz <=
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/05
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], Michael Matz, 2001/04/06
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/06
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], edward, 2001/04/06
- Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwinupdates], s_a_white, 2001/04/07