[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: assign keyword
From: |
Paolo Redælli |
Subject: |
Re: assign keyword |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jul 2022 08:40:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 |
Il 05/07/22 22:46, Louis M via ha scritto:
Hi,
Personally, I think that we should go ECMA compliant. I know that
historically, Small/Liberty Eiffel did not necessarily want to follow
the ECMA standard, but I think that we will all win by not having too
much difference between Eiffel syntaxes.
I'm glad we all agree. In fact while I still think that current Liberty
implementation
x: BAR; set_x (a_bar: like x) assign x
sounds more like a natural language, also the ECMA way
x: BAR assign set_x; set_x (a_bar: like x)
has its reasons. The most important is that putting the assign on the
query can be easier to find and understand to the end user of a class.
So let's go the ECMA way and schedule it for dennis.
I was tempted to propose a both-way alternative but it won't give us any
actual, sound benefit.