|
From: | Mateusz [PEYN] Adamus |
Subject: | Re: Bug fixing and CVS tagging |
Date: | Wed, 03 Aug 2005 08:42:49 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) |
Pierre Asselin napisaĆ(a):
Yes, if you want to ship updates that fix only a subset of the known bugs. Or if your fix is so hasty that you may want to back it out and do it over. In either case, you could fix each bug in its own branch, either a subbranch of the release branch, or a co-branch rooted at the same point as the release branch itself. I don't think its worth the effort, though.
Lately I read a book about CVS "Pragmatic Version Control" by David Thomas and Abdrew Hunt and it was said in that book not to use to many branches, not to complicate to much. So how many branches is to much? (I'm talking about recurent branches ofcourse).
If you run a team you have to be a little careful about others committing stuff while you're doing this. Post again if you need details --but it seems you're working solo ?
I'm working with 4 other guys. It's a small company. We're all sitting in one room so we can talk to each other. Although, we are trying not to distract one another to often
best regards Mateusz [PEYN] Adamus
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |