[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Nov 2003 12:09:02 -0500 (EST) |
Maarten de Boer writes:
> From address@hidden Fri Nov 7 05:46:49 2003
> Received: by ypnefprocess.pl
> Received: from tyr.sdrc.com (mailhub-cvg.sdrc.com [146.122.142.31])
> by thor.sdrc.com (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id hA7AkmY06104
> for <address@hidden>; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 05:46:48 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from cvgexsrv1.sdrc.com (cvgexsrv1.sdrc.com [146.122.145.23])
> by tyr.sdrc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_17190)/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA14731
> for <address@hidden>; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 05:46:46 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from stlntx2.plms-eds.com ([134.244.32.21]) by cvgexsrv1.sdrc.com
> with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
> Fri, 7 Nov 2003 05:46:46 -0500
> Received: by stlntx2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
> id <WM62FVG3>; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 04:45:52 -0600
> Received: from plmler7.mail.eds.com ([199.228.142.67]) by cypntx.plms-eds.com
> with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59)
> id WLXM4L3N; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 01:12:05 -0800
> Received: from plmlir3.mail.eds.com (plmlir3-2.mail.eds.com [199.228.142.133])
> by plmler7.mail.eds.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA79C7Ci019600
> for <address@hidden>; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 04:12:07 -0500
> Received: from plmlir3.mail.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by plmlir3.mail.eds.com (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hA79C6H02928
> for <address@hidden>; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 04:12:06 -0500
> Received: from usplm101.exsc01.exch.eds.com (USPLM101.txpln.us.eds.com
> [198.132.135.14])
> by plmlir3.mail.eds.com (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hA79C6g02924
> for <address@hidden>; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 04:12:06 -0500
> Received: by USPLM101.txpln.us.eds.com with Internet Mail Service
> (5.5.2657.72)
> id <WJGNA32P>; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 03:12:02 -0600
> Received: from plmlir1.mail.eds.com ([205.191.22.41]) by
> usplm102.exsc01.exch.eds.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
> Service Version 5.5.2657.72)
> id WKBXVB7C; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 03:11:59 -0600
> Received: from plmler3.mail.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by plmlir1.mail.eds.com (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hA79C3b15437
> for <address@hidden>; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 04:12:03 -0500
> Received: from plmler3.mail.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by plmler3.mail.eds.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA79Acq9021740
> for <address@hidden>; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 03:10:38 -0600
> Received: from monty-python.gnu.org (monty-python.gnu.org [199.232.76.173])
> by plmler3.mail.eds.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA79Ac0p021736
> for <address@hidden>; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 03:10:38 -0600
> Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
> by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
> id 1AI2ca-0006Ha-F5
> for address@hidden; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 04:09:36 -0500
> Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24)
> id 1AI2Zl-0004PR-5t
> for address@hidden; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 04:06:41 -0500
> Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24)
> id 1AI2ZD-0003rc-MO
> for address@hidden; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 04:06:38 -0500
> Received: from [193.145.55.10] (helo=iua-mail.upf.es)
> by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AI2Yu-0003aY-Oc
> for address@hidden; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 04:05:49 -0500
> Received: from mtg62.upf.es ([193.145.55.62] helo=localhost.upf.es)
> by iua-mail.upf.es with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
> id 1AI2bO-0006Wi-00; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 10:08:22 +0100
> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:05:10 +0100
> From: Maarten de Boer <address@hidden>
> To: "Geoff Beier" <address@hidden>
> Message-Id: <address@hidden>
> In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
> References: <address@hidden>
> <address@hidden>
> <address@hidden>
> Organization: IUA
> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.5-gtk2-20030906 (GTK+ 2.2.4; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
> X-Face: #AF_uwd1lP*AOzp4)IlS4<F~{kOi>jBI4){\,
> aLiwl<~_}TN7\d_2r*/!ZEGf3sX/uirHf)address@hidden,
> )H(Rb&'+9)R^TT5YOTulm!tdEY~>_=`v>/(m)Go
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> content-transfer-encoding: -SUGGEST
> X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact address@hidden for more
> information
> X-MTG-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0,
> required 5)
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail
> X-BeenThere: address@hidden
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
> Precedence: list
> List-Id: Announcements and discussions for the CVS version control system
> <info-cvs.gnu.org>
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs>,
> <mailto:address@hidden>
> List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/info-cvs>
> List-Post: <mailto:address@hidden>
> List-Help: <mailto:address@hidden>
> List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs>,
> <mailto:address@hidden>
> Sender: address@hidden
> Errors-To: address@hidden
> X-Brightmail-Flag: NO
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0
> tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES
> version=2.55
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
> X-Spam-Report: This mail has been scanned in order to control spam.
> The results are given below in the "Content Analysis" line.
> If the number of "points" is greater than "required",
> then this mail is very probably spam.
> See http://antispam.mail.eds.com for more details.
> Content Analysis: (-2.00 points, 5 required)
> REFERENCES (-0.5 points) Has a valid-looking References header
> IN_REP_TO (-0.5 points) Has a In-Reply-To header
> QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT (-0.5 points) BODY: Contains what looks like a quoted
> email text
> REPLY_WITH_QUOTES (-0.5 points) Reply with quoted text
> X-Spam-Flag: NO
> X-Envelope-Trace: plmler3.hA79Acq9021740
> X-Envelope-From: <address@hidden>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2003 10:46:46.0717 (UTC)
> FILETIME=[70D4D6D0:01C3A51C]
> X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=0.13.7.2
>
>
> > Sorry if this is a silly question, but have you put a shell in your jail?
> > http://tiefighter.et.tudelft.nl/~arthur/cvsd/faq.html#cvsscripts
>
> No, I haven't, but why would I? What I execute from loginfo is a standalone
> application, it should not need a shell at all.
>
> Maarten
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Info-cvs mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
>
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, (continued)
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Paul Sander, 2003/11/06
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Larry Jones, 2003/11/06
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Maarten De Boer, 2003/11/06
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Geoff Beier, 2003/11/07
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Maarten de Boer, 2003/11/07
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Geoff Beier, 2003/11/07
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Maarten de Boer, 2003/11/07
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Geoff Beier, 2003/11/07
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Maarten de Boer, 2003/11/07
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail,
Larry Jones <=
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Larry Jones, 2003/11/07
- Cannot remove Branch, Gagneet Singh, 2003/11/09
- Re: Cannot remove Branch, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/11/09
RE: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Jim.Hyslop, 2003/11/07
RE: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Schrum, Allan (Allan), 2003/11/07