[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail
From: |
Maarten De Boer |
Subject: |
Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Nov 2003 00:13:48 +0000 (UTC) |
> Most likely, the problem is that some command your script uses doesn't
> exist in your chroot jail -- perhaps even the script's interpreter. I'd
It's not a script, it's a small executable - written in c.
> suggest running CVS with tracing enabled to see if that tells you
> anything, although I don't think it will.
Tried that. Does not tell me anything helpful...
> If not, add an echo into a
> file as the very first thing in the script to see if it's being run at
> all.
Tried fopen, fprintf, fclose. To no avail...
> If it is, you can add more echos to see where it dies. You could
> also try running the script manually inside the chroot jail.
Tried that. It works.
Has anybody here run loginfo's with a chrooted cvs server succesfully?
And could people with a chrooted cvs server test this behaviour?
Maarten
- Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Maarten de Boer, 2003/11/06
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Paul Sander, 2003/11/06
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Larry Jones, 2003/11/06
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail,
Maarten De Boer <=
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Geoff Beier, 2003/11/07
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Maarten de Boer, 2003/11/07
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Geoff Beier, 2003/11/07
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Maarten de Boer, 2003/11/07
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Geoff Beier, 2003/11/07
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Maarten de Boer, 2003/11/07
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Larry Jones, 2003/11/07
- Re: Broken pipe with loginfo in a chroot jail, Larry Jones, 2003/11/07
- Cannot remove Branch, Gagneet Singh, 2003/11/09
- Re: Cannot remove Branch, Mark D. Baushke, 2003/11/09