igraph-help
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [igraph] experiences with combining igraph with one of the multicore


From: Martin Tomko
Subject: Re: [igraph] experiences with combining igraph with one of the multicore/parallel processing packages from R
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:55:36 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3

Thank you Gabor,
I am currently evaluating my options, being bound to Win and not having admin privileges on the Server... it is a pain.
Running multiple igraph functions at the same time is exactly what I want.

and I guess I have to rewrite some of my functions to fit lapply and similar functions, I have been using too many loops. But I am getting into troubles when I do something like lapply(graph,function), I guess because of coercing graphs into lists...

Anyway, I will report about how I go.
thanks
Martin


On 8/31/2010 11:48 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
Martin,

I used snow with an MPI backend (LAM), and it works fine. It is also
very easy to use, on a multicore machine or on a cluster.

This will not make igraph functions faster, of course, but you can run
more functions at the same time.

Best,
Gabor

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Martin Tomko<address@hidden>  wrote:
Does anyone have experiences integrating one of the multicore approaches in
R with igraph?
I see that multicore will not run on Win, did anyone play around with
foreach, or mapReduceR or others?

Thanks
Martin

_______________________________________________
igraph-help mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help





--
Martin Tomko
Postdoctoral Research Assistant

Geographic Information Systems Division
Department of Geography
University of Zurich - Irchel
Winterthurerstr. 190
CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland

email:  address@hidden
site:   http://www.geo.uzh.ch/~mtomko
mob:    +41-788 629 558
tel:    +41-44-6355256
fax:    +41-44-6356848




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]