Re: [Ifile-discuss] Effect of widely differing volumes on ifile classification

[Jens Peter Secher]

Jack Bertram <address@hidden> writes:

> Recently, the rate, which had been consistent for some time, began to
> plunge to about 50%

> Date            Total   Incorrect       Percentage
> ----            ------- ---------       ----------
> Sun Mar  9    106     0               100%    - didn't read email; no 
> reclassification done
> Mon Mar 10    93      48              48.3%

With the above comment I think it is pretty clear was has happened:
Sunday, a few mails were misclassified, but you didn't notice this (so
the percentage was actually not 100).  By skipping reclassification of
the (probably few) mails, the /following/ mails in the same threads all
ended up in the wrong categories.

The problem is that you cannot leave ifile unattended when using
classify-and-insert (option -Q).  In my experience, spam/ham
classification works well with classify-and-insert, whereas full
classification works best with delayed reclassification (ie., option -q
plus a script that goes over your folders and notices movements).

Just my 2 cents (Euro)
-- 
                                                    Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher get2net dk_