[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: time for libio?
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: time for libio? |
Date: |
29 Nov 2001 16:50:18 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Roland McGrath <address@hidden> writes:
> > I don't think that much effort is necessary.
>
> Well, you don't know as much about it as I do.
> I said it was doable. Hair is involved. Trust me.
> We need to be sure we care before we bother with it.
I think we do care; that should be clear. We must upgrade at some
point, and if you think the code is mature enough to give it a whirl,
now's a perfectly good time.
What I'm saying is that this is like any other soname-bumping library
upgrade on Debian--it doesn't require a flag day, as long as both the
old and new libraries can happily co-exist on the same system. And,
they can, right?
Thomas
- time for libio?, Roland McGrath, 2001/11/29
- Re: time for libio?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/11/29
- Re: time for libio?, Roland McGrath, 2001/11/29
- Re: time for libio?,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: time for libio?, Roland McGrath, 2001/11/29
- Re: time for libio?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/11/29
- Re: time for libio?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/11/30
- Re: time for libio?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/11/30
Re: time for libio?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/11/29