Re: Getting the control port from a translator

[Neal H Walfield]

> It's more important to me that all the kinds of permission checking be
> centralized into a small number of spots all in fshelp, than what the
> actual policy is (because it's easy to change it later in just one place).

Ok.

> I'm sure you didn't suggest the name "fshelp_iscontroler" before, because I
> surely would have insisted at least that you call it "fshelp_iscontroller"
> instead.

In fact, you are correct.

I forgot to include reference to this message:
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-hurd/2001-April/004134.html, where I
suggest that there is no difference between fshelp_isowner and
fshelp_iscontroller.  Comments?

pgpPLRJKSlvjX.pgp
Description: PGP signature