Re: @defun and @defvr in the "same" block?

[Patrice Dumas]

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 07:21:05AM -0800, Raymond Toy wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:59 AM Patrice Dumas <pertusus@free.fr> wrote:
> 
> I personally find it kind of weird to mix deffn and defvrx in the same
> block.  If I were writing this from scratch, I would have separated them.
> But this is a conversion of an old Scribe doc, so that's way too much
> effort.  I might just do
> 
> @defun
> @end defun
> @defvar
> <description>
> @end defvar

Seems good enough.

> to get the entries into the right index and still have it look as if
> they're together as in the original doc.  This is mostly busy work.
> 
> Oh, and for the record, look at
> https://cmucl.common-lisp.dev/doc/encycmuclopedia/devenv/cim.ps for the
> original Scribe version.  Look at the bottom of page 7.
> 
> For the conversion, see the bottom of page 6 of
> https://cmucl.common-lisp.dev/docs/hem/cim/cim.pdf
> 
> just so the various bits are in the correct index.

This looks right.

-- 
Pat