[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @defun and @defvr in the "same" block?
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: @defun and @defvr in the "same" block? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:59:46 +0100 |
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 08:35:01PM -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > Currently yes. But indeed, it would be natural in that case to follow
> > @deffn by @defvarx. I think that it would not be hard to implement that
> > in texi2any, but I am not sure that we want to have that possibility in
> > the Texinfo language.
>
> What would be wrong with it?
I don't know, but if it is not already in the language, it may be
because there could be some issues.
--
Pat
- @defun and @defvr in the "same" block?, Raymond Toy, 2022/11/21
- Re: @defun and @defvr in the "same" block?, Patrice Dumas, 2022/11/21
- Re: @defun and @defvr in the "same" block?, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2022/11/21
- Re: @defun and @defvr in the "same" block?,
Patrice Dumas <=
- Re: @defun and @defvr in the "same" block?, Raymond Toy, 2022/11/22
- Re: @defun and @defvr in the "same" block?, Patrice Dumas, 2022/11/22
- Re: @defun and @defvr in the "same" block?, Gavin Smith, 2022/11/22
- Re: @defun and @defvr in the "same" block?, Raymond Toy, 2022/11/22
- Re: @defun and @defvr in the "same" block?, Gavin Smith, 2022/11/23
- Re: @defun and @defvr in the "same" block?, Gavin Smith, 2022/11/23
- Re: @defun and @defvr in the "same" block?, Raymond Toy, 2022/11/25