[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "housekeeping question" concerning octave-instrument-control-toolbox
From: |
Stefan Mahr |
Subject: |
Re: "housekeeping question" concerning octave-instrument-control-toolbox |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:59:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 |
> Oh, I thought we were talking about Andrius's package, not your package.
>
> Will you integrate your package into Andrius's?
USBTMC, TCP and GPIB packages are ported, but not included to octave
forge. Andrius had no time to review it yet.
> Btw, you should be careful with the word "toolbox". TMW claims
> trademarks on a bunch of terms with the word "toolbox":
>
>
http://www.mathworks.com/company/aboutus/policies_statements/trademarks.html
>
> It is for this reason that we generally don't refer to Octave packages
> as "toolboxes".
Thanks for pointing out. Renamed to "octave-instrument-control".
Stefan