[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using butterworth filter
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: Using butterworth filter |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Dec 2012 01:14:35 -0800 (PST) |
----- Original Message -----
> From: StandardOctaveUser <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 10:55 AM
> Subject: Re: Using butterworth filter
>
[snip]
> Ie. butterworth is generally
> preferred where pass and stop
> band quality is more important
> than transition sharpness.
[snip]
> --
Huh ?
Justify that Butterworth is better than, say, Bessel.
Or that it's better than Chebyshev.
Have you ever also considered _phase_ response ?
Do you at all understand when phase response is important ?
As I said, one needs to _exactly_ understand what the final "destination" of
the signal is, i.e. for what it ultimately is supposed to be used, and based on
that to select appropriate filter.
Regards,
Sergei.
- Re: Filtering Signals according to an Amplitude Range, (continued)
- Re: Filtering Signals according to an Amplitude Range, Ismael Diego Nunez-Riboni, 2012/12/07
- Re: Filtering Signals according to an Amplitude Range, Ismael Diego Nunez-Riboni, 2012/12/07
- Re: Filtering Signals according to an Amplitude Range, pkohvaei, 2012/12/07
- Re: Filtering Signals according to an Amplitude Range, Ozzy Lash, 2012/12/07
- Re: Filtering Signals according to an Amplitude Range, pkohvaei, 2012/12/14
- Re: Filtering Signals according to an Amplitude Range, pkohvaei, 2012/12/14
- Using butterworth filter, StandardOctaveUser, 2012/12/14
- Re: Using butterworth filter, StandardOctaveUser, 2012/12/14
- Re: Using butterworth filter, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/12/15
- Re: Using butterworth filter, StandardOctaveUser, 2012/12/15
- Re: Using butterworth filter,
Sergei Steshenko <=
- Re: Using butterworth filter, StandardOctaveUser, 2012/12/15
- Re: Using butterworth filter, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/12/15
- Re: Filtering Signals according to an Amplitude Range, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2012/12/08