[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hilbert transform
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: Hilbert transform |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Jul 2012 10:50:35 -0400 |
On Jul 7, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Ben Abbott <address@hidden>
>> To: Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden>; "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
>> Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2012 7:11 AM
>> Subject: Re: Hilbert transform
>>
> [snip]
>>
>> The hilbert function relies upon the fft(). Which implies the signal being
>> transformed should be periodic.
>>
>> You'll need to add the negative frequencies to the frequency_response.
>>
>> frequency_response = [frequency_response,
>> fliplr(frequency_response(2:end))]
>>
>> And then use the Hilbert transform to recover the phase information.
>>
>> Ben
>>
>
> Thanks a lot, that _really_ helps with the Butterworth filter example.
>
> However, it makes things worse with my experimental data. The data may be
> problematic - it intentionally has measured data up to _half_ Nyquist
> frequency (sample_rate/4), so data above it is noise. Maybe this noise
> baffles the transform.
Can you attach the data?
Ben
- Re: Hilbert transform, (continued)
- Re: Hilbert transform, Przemek Klosowski, 2012/07/09
- Re: Hilbert transform, Przemek Klosowski, 2012/07/09
- Re: Hilbert transform, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/07/09
- Re: Hilbert transform, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/07/06
- Re: Hilbert transform, Ben Abbott, 2012/07/07
- Re: Hilbert transform, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/07/07
- Re: Hilbert transform,
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: Hilbert transform, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/07/07
- Re: Hilbert transform, John B. Thoo, 2012/07/07
- Re: Hilbert transform, John B. Thoo, 2012/07/07
- Re: Hilbert transform, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/07/07