[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ? |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Aug 2011 01:04:46 -0700 (PDT) |
--- On Sat, 8/6/11, Marco atzeri <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Marco atzeri <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?
> To: "Sergei Steshenko" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Saturday, August 6, 2011, 12:29 AM
> On 8/6/2011 9:13 AM, Sergei Steshenko
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Again, if your statement is correct, could you please
> reopen
> >
> > http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?33954
> >
> > and state "numel is not supposed to handle food2d{:}"
> there ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sergei.
>
> Your bugs request has been closed as numel works as matlab
> does.
> That is a fact.
>
[snip]
At the moment I doubt the validity of
"
numel works as matlab does.
".
This is because I have read a post in this thread:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/numel-foo-feature-or-bug-td3720972.html#a3721796
which says that the answer is '96' while I had '72'.
The poster, Philip Nienhuis, uses Windows while I use Linux, and, if I
understand correctly, Philip Nienhuis tried exactly the same test case
as I did.
So, is it so that Matlab behaves differently on Linux and on Windows and
that Octave beahves _exactly_ like Matlab on both OSes ?
Also, should MacOS behavior be different from both Linux and Windows one ?
Thanks,
Sergei.
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, (continued)
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Marco atzeri, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Marco atzeri, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Marco atzeri, 2011/08/06
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?,
Sergei Steshenko <=
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, fork, 2011/08/05
- Re: numel(foo{:}) - feature or bug ?, Sergei Steshenko, 2011/08/06