[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 03:28:43 +0900 (JST) |
Hello
--- fork wrote:
> I would use these testing binaries in production (such as it is) if there were
> an incremental readline and a way to print. Is there a way to set these up,
> do
> you know or can you give me a hint?
To be honest, I cannot understand what is a problem for command line history.
Please show me more detailed example that you think as a problem.
I also cannot understand meaning of 'a way print'.
Does it mean print command?
Sorry I'm not good at English so please explain in detail using examples.
Regards
Tatsuro
--------------------------------------
Get the new Internet Explorer 8 optimized for Yahoo! JAPAN
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ie8/
- testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2011/02/01
- Re: testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded, fork, 2011/02/02
- Re: testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded,
Tatsuro MATSUOKA <=
- Re: testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded, fork, 2011/02/02
- Re: testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded, John W. Eaton, 2011/02/02
- Re: testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded, fork, 2011/02/02
- Re: testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded, John W. Eaton, 2011/02/02
- Re: testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded, John W. Eaton, 2011/02/02
- Re: testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded, fork, 2011/02/02
- Re: testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded, fork, 2011/02/02
- Re: testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded, John W. Eaton, 2011/02/02
- Re: testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded, fork, 2011/02/02
- Re: testing binary of octave-3.3.91 (mingw32) is uploaded, John W. Eaton, 2011/02/02