[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problems with QtOctave
From: |
CdeMills |
Subject: |
Re: Problems with QtOctave |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Sep 2010 01:39:57 -0700 (PDT) |
pathematica wrote:
>
> I contrast, whilst I greatly admire Emacs and Vim and I wished I had the
> skills to use them, unfortunately I don't think it would be a good use of
> my time.
>
You could have said that ten years ago. Since a few years, Emacs has a
traditional GUI interface. You don't have to learn all the magic keystrokes,
you bring the cursor on the menu, click, get the next item, and so on. And
octave-mode in Emacs is invaluable to colorize and tabiffy the right way
your code. When I hit enter and see a badly indented line, I know something
weird happened, badly closed parenthesis,, unclosed if - endif blocks, and
the like. To me, Emacs learning curve is not that high, and the added-value
much worth the time you'll spend learning it.
Regards
Pascal
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Problems-with-QtOctave-tp2428087p2525312.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Problems with QtOctave, (continued)
- Re: Problems with QtOctave, Michael Goffioul, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with QtOctave, Martin Helm, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with QtOctave, Laurent Hoeltgen, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with QtOctave, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with QtOctave, Laurent Hoeltgen, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with QtOctave, fork, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with QtOctave, pathematica, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with QtOctave, pathematica, 2010/09/03
- Re: Problems with QtOctave,
CdeMills <=
- Re: Problems with QtOctave, Francesco Potortì, 2010/09/03
- Re: Problems with QtOctave, Michael Grossbach, 2010/09/03
- Re: Problems with QtOctave, fork, 2010/09/03