|
From: | Corrado |
Subject: | Re: Constrained non linear regression using ML |
Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:01:47 +0000 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
Dear Fredrik, dear Octave friends, First of all thanks for coming back to me.I have 40,000 vectors of observations: {y,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5 ..... pn}_j where j spans over the 40,000 vectors (that is from 1 to 40,000).
The k={k0,k1,k2,k3,k4,.....,kn} is the vector of parameters to be determined by fitting.
I believe you are right, in machine lerning language, the {1,p1,p2,....,pn} vector would be called the input.
y is the response variable.PS: If you build a frequency histogram from the y_j, the distribution looks approximately beta, but fails tests because of the number of points ....
Best, Fredrik Lingvall wrote:
On 03/16/10 20:01, Corrado wrote:Dear Octave users, I have to fit the non linear regression: y~1-exp(-(k0+k1*p1+k2*p2+ .... +kn*pn)) where ki>=0 for each i in [1 .... n] and pi are on R+. I am using, at the moment, nls, but I would rather use a Maximum Likelhood based algorithm. The error is not necessarily normally distributed. y is approximately beta distributed, and the volume of data is medium to large (the y,pi may have ~ 40,000 elements). Any suggestion? RegardsCorrado, Can you tell us a little more about your problem? As I understand it you have a model, y = 1 - exp(-k'*p) + e where k = [k_0 k_1 ... k_n]' and p = [1 p_1 p_2 ... p_n]' and where y is your data vector, p is your "input signal" and k is the parameter vector of your model. Have I understood you correctly?/Fredrik
-- Corrado Topi PhD Researcher Global Climate Change and Biodiversity Area 18,Department of Biology University of York, York, YO10 5YW, UK Phone: + 44 (0) 1904 328645, E-mail: address@hidden
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |