Re: octave vs. matlab vectorization

[matt]

hi james,

good point! i have rechecked and the loop code *is* 5x quicker--this  
with matlab 7.5.0.338 and, i just noticed, matlab compiler 4.7.


On 14 Sep 2009, at 18:43, James Sherman Jr. wrote:

> >ah, no! code 1 was *faster* under matlab! the ratio is 0.19:1
> >
> >i find this result quite staggering.
>
> I ran those two codes with the matlab I have on my laptop  
> (7.7.0.471 R2008b) and got 16.9 for the for loops code and 3.54 for  
> the vectorized code.
>
> I don't know why there would be such a discrepancy.  This may sound  
> dumb, but are you sure you didn't confuse the two times?